자기기입식 설문도구의 치주염 진단 가능성 평가
Diagnostic predictability of self-reported questionnaire for periodontitis
진혜정, 김백일, 박덕영, 정성화, 배광학, 김진범, 정승화, 이혜린, 우경지, 최연희,
소속 상세정보
진혜정 ( Jin Hye-Jung ) - 동의대학교 치위생학과
김백일 ( Kim Baek-Il ) - 연세대학교 치과대학 예방치과학교실
박덕영 ( Park Deok-Young ) - 강릉원주대학교 치과대학 예방치학교실
정성화 ( Jeong Seong-Hwa ) - 대구한의대학교 보건학부
배광학 ( Bae Kwang-Hak ) - 서울대학교 치의학대학원 예방치학교실
김진범 ( Kim Jin-Bom ) - 부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실
정승화 ( Jeong Seung-Hwa ) - 부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실
이혜린 ( Lee Hye-Rin ) - 질병관리본부 건강영양조사과
우경지 ( Woo Gyeong-Ji ) - 질병관리본부 건강영양조사과
최연희 ( Choi Youn-Hee ) - 경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실
KMID : 0355420150390010063
Abstract
Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the validity of a set of self-reported questionnaires for periodontitis for estimating the prevalence of chronic adult periodontitis in the Korean population.
Methods: The questionnaire is comprised of a total of 14 questions with four summarized concepts including self-diagnosis of oral status, subjective signs related to oral health, smoking and drinking status, and use of auxiliary oral hygiene devices including scaling. The predictiveness of the measures from these self-reported questions was assessed by logistic regression modeling using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC including all questions were 0.571, 0.768, and 0.781, respectively; the sum of sensitivity and specificity was 1.34. To gain robustness, a simplified predictive model was built with six questions. Its results were 0.536, 0.817, and 0.762 for sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively. The sum of sensitivity and specificity was found to be 1.35.
Conclusions: The self-reported questionnaire for periodontitis showed considerable validity, but further study is required to provide optimal validity and predictability.
키워드
Periodontal disease; ROC; Sensitivity; Specificity
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보